Credas Technologies, the leading identity verification checks provider, has found that a significant proportion of UK homebuyers aren’t being asked to provide ID when purchasing a property, let alone having their ID properly verified. The survey of UK homebuyers asked when purchasing their last property, did the selling agent ask for proof of identity, such as, but not limited to, a passport or driving licence?
The shock survey results highlight the importance of checking ID by insurers before Buildings and Contents, or Business Use cover is issued on recently purchased houses.
77% of respondents said they were asked to prove their identity, a task that can be completed quickly with a passport or driving licence, a biometric residence permit, national identity card or a combination of documents such as council tax bills, bank statements and utility bills. It can also be done via a KBV, where a number of questions are asked based on personal information from their credit file.
Despite the relative ease and range of options available to help verify someone’s identity, around a quarter (23%) of those surveyed by Credas Technologies admitted they hadn’t been asked to verify their identity at all.
When asked the same with respect to their current address, 30% also stated they provided no proof, for example, in the form of a utility bill or similar. Some 13% stated that they weren’t asked to verify their identity by their lawyer or solicitor once the sale had started to progress. Also,18% also said that when starting out, their mortgage broker also failed to verify their identity properly, which is astonishing.
Tim Barnett, CEO of Credas Technologies says
“For the vast majority of those operating within the property industry, failing to verify the identity of a potential buyer may sound unbelievable. Not only is there a legal requirement to do so, but it can also be incredibly detrimental should they fall foul of criminal activity.
Unfortunately, it does happen more often than you may think, particularly for those attempting to verify a vast number of buyers on a manual basis. This is almost certainly an oversight due to stretched resources, rather than a cavalier attitude on the part of property industry professionals.
However, it does demonstrate the value that can be gained from a professional approach, whereby one identity verification can then be used across every area of the transaction process and by multiple shareholders such as agents, solicitors and mortgage brokers. It also highlights the value of investing in a bonafide onboarding platform that will prevent any transaction from progressing should a buyer’s identity not be properly verified.
Not only does this approach save time, money and resources, but it reduces the chance for criminal entities to utilise the industry to launder their ill-gotten gains.”