This piece is by Ben Rose, President and Co-Founder of Supercede.
The pricing reductions seen in the reinsurance market at 1 June renewals were largely as expected for many in the reinsurance market. Property-catastrophe rates reported by the major brokers fell by as much as 25% – and that drop followed meaningful reductions at 1 January and 1 April, marking a new phase in the ongoing softening of the market.
But what might have caught some off guard this renewal season was the speed and shape of change. The industry expends a lot of time discussing rates and market conditions, but in a softer, faster-moving market, the firms that perform best may not be those with the neatest predictions. Instead, it will be those able to respond quickest when conditions shift late in the process.
That distinction matters. A renewal is not a theoretical exercise. It is a live negotiation involving changing capacity, shifting risk appetite, evolving exposures and compressed timelines. When prices move late, or when reinsurers take a different view of a programme than anticipated, cedents need to understand their options immediately. Should they change limits? Retain more risk? Buy a composite or multi-line cover? Separate treaties and place them individually? Revisit buying strategies that were appropriate in a harder market but may now be outdated?
Without a full view of risk and market conditions, cedents are working with one hand tied behind their backs. In practice, that visibility is often harder to achieve than it should be. Reinsurance buying relies heavily on outdated, manual processes – at calm points in the cycle, those frictions are inefficient. In volatile moments, they become a commercial disadvantage.
The current environment is full of class-specific nuance. The market is watching the conflict in the Middle East closely, with the extent of its impact still crystallising. The ability to interpret those moving parts quickly for Lloyd’s and the London company market – where insurers often manage complex international portfolios – is becoming central to renewal strategy.
This is why adaptability is as important as foresight. But adapting quickly is difficult without clarity. Cedents and brokers need to understand not only what is changing, but how those changes affect their programme, where they have options, and where support is most likely to come from. That understanding gives them the confidence to make decisions quickly and avoid surprises as conditions evolve.
When rates are falling, there is a temptation to see the renewal purely through a savings lens. But there is still a decision to be made: if a cedent can secure better terms, should they use the opportunity to buy more protection, smooth volatility across classes, simplify structures, or should they retain savings? At 1.6 we saw many choosing to capitalise on the pricing slide to purchase broader protection.
The industry has spent a great deal of time debating technology transformation, AI and the future of digital infrastructure. That big picture thinking is important, but teams on the ground need solutions now: they need to be able see their position clearly and act while there is still time to influence the outcome.
The next few cycles may therefore reward a different kind of discipline. Not the discipline of sticking rigidly to assumptions made months before a renewal, informed by historical buying strategies, but the discipline of building data foundations strong enough to support rapid change. In a softer market, agility is not a nice-to-have. It is how cedents capture opportunity without losing control.
For years, reinsurance buying has often been judged by how accurately firms anticipate the market. That still matters. But after another renewal season marked by late movement and fast-changing conditions, the more important question may be simpler: when the market moves, can you move with it?
Be the first to comment